A) Included Features
Features available at the time of purchase are included in your plan. Future features are generally included as long as they do not introduce significant ongoing costs (such as per-use, AI LLM, 3rd party API, infrastructure, or bandwidth expenses).
B) AI, Credits & Variable Costs
This product uses third-party AI models (text, image, and/or video), and costs may vary over time. Credit usage and generation limits may be adjusted based on underlying provider pricing, which is outside the partner’s control. Current credit usage is outlined in the plans and/or FAQ at the time of purchase.
C) Paid Add-ons
If new features introduce meaningful ongoing costs, partners may offer them as optional paid add-ons (one-time or recurring), often at discounted rates for lifetime deal customers. This helps ensure long-term sustainability of the product.
D) Plan Mapping & Changes
Lifetime deal plans are based on the partner’s current plan structure at the time of purchase. Partners may update plan names, pricing, or limits over time. Your LTD will continue to reflect the value and limits defined at purchase, but does not guarantee access to all future highest-tier offerings.
E) Feature Changes or Removal
Products evolve. Features may be improved, replaced, or removed entirely based on business needs. If a feature is removed, it will be removed for all users (not just LTD holders). Previously included features will not be converted into paid add-ons unless they are fundamentally reworked or replaced.
F) Fair Use & Limits
All plans are subject to reasonable usage limits to prevent abuse and ensure platform stability. This may include rate limits, throttling, or other safeguards.
G) Third-Party Integrations
Integrations and external services depend on third-party providers. Changes to those providers (pricing, APIs, or availability) may impact or remove certain integrations.
H) Long-Term Availability
Lifetime deals provide access for the lifetime of the product, not a guaranteed duration. If the company is acquired, pivots significantly, or shuts down, services may be discontinued.
Final Note to Buyers
We encourage you to make your purchase decision based on the product’s current capabilities and assume the roadmap, if any, is a possibility not a guarantee. If you have questions, please ask before purchasing.
Got a Question? Ask here.
Is this comparable to JustReachOut.io? Or if not, is the goal for it to eventually be something along that line?
Hi Frank – Yes, and the roadmap is here – https://linksourcery.com/roadmap/
Per my discussions, the broader vision is going in that direction. Hope that helps.
For tier 3, can you specify what “all sources” and “exclusive sources” are? Do we need to get separate paid accounts from those sources or are you wrapping them into the deal? What is exclusive?
Exclusive Sources are link opportunities the team secures from journalists and publications directly (not via another platform). These are exclusive to Link Sourcery.
All Sources means other sources which may get added in the future. Some are paid data sources and cost them money ongoing which is why they can’t just give them away in every plan and have to be mindful on how to offer it.
If it is a metered source which costs them, then they will come up with an add-on for it.
They’re still early with a lot to work on so there’s no specifically defined sources. However, if any future source gets added to the Agency Plan, it will be included if you have that tier.
What constitutes a “project?” As a single freelancer, is the starter plan what I should be looking at?
Think of projects like “brands” or “clients”. If you plan on using it from various clients, then opt for a higher tier.
If you’re a sole freelancer and plan on using it just for your own brand, then the Starter plan is all you need.
It’s a new unproven product (from an equally unproven team), but if after testing and hearing that they aspire to be similar to JustReachOut I may be interested in upgrading or stacking from Pro to Agency. Is that possible? Will be worth it if they come anywhere close.
Frank – respectively, both your statements are false.
1] “new unproven product” – they have paying customers that pay them monthly (MRR) and have been working at this for approx a year. This isn’t an overnight product like most others in the market. We’re lucky to have the LTD. Trust me, and their paying customers, and their large loyal community, they didn’t need to do this LTD and most certainly aren’t new. This explains why this deal is so popular. It solves a real need, helps link builders make money and improve their operations, and moves the needle.
2] “an equally unproven team” – ??ummm…. they’re leaders and pioneers (literally were the first) of the HARO-as-a-service space. There’s literally not a higher status they could have in this industry nor could they prove more. Can you please share why you’d say they’re “unproven” when they’re the guys that everyone else is following and learning from in this industry? It’s like saying Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen were an unproven team so am very confused by such a statement 🙂
As for whether possible to upgrade from Pro to Agency – it will NOT be possible. Have to choose now if interested. There are limited license codes that RocketHub is allocated to sell. Once they run out, they’re out and we will not sell more of that tier. Inside info… I can already tell you right now that Agency tier will be the first to run out.
Regarding your point about going in direction or JRO, I agree with you 😉
Can i use it for spanish proyects?
Hey Cris, you can see below, but unfortunately, there are only English opportunities on the platform, but that may change at some point!
Can I use for French project?
Hey Stef, right now it is only in English, as the opportunities are all English language, but we are definitely open to including multilingual options in the future!
Do I need a paid Haro subscription or any other paid tool to use this?
Hey Matt, co-founder of Sourcery here! You don’t need any other paid tools to use Link Sourcery, however if you’d like to hit HARO opportunities, you’ll need the free HARO version.
It looks interesting, but you need to do a video tutorial on how to use the product to entice people to buy it as an LTD or normal deal. I’m surprised of the very little video information on the product. 3 videos are less than 3 minutes long, and then the link sorcery name on YouTube has some unrelated to this product videos.
Hey Brad, thanks for the feedback here! Definitely something to explore
Hey Charlie. How does the link request work? I have a bunch of similar tools, many of the sites end up asking for paid sponsor posts, no reply,or link exchange in return.
And the Journal Pitching is a separate system, similar to HARO?
Hi Daren – sorry I missed this.
1] The Link Exchange network is NEW. We just launched it the day this deal went live. We will vet high-quality sites to join it and already started. These will be sites where you are either the owner OR have contributor abilities (meaning you can write or edit blog posts for insertions).
We want to start with a low entry barrier of at least DR: 30
We get a lot of link exchange requests scattered via email, Slack, LinkedIn DMs, Messenger, etc. Now you just tell those people to submit it via PitchResponse so that you can manage it all in one place.
AND you can initiate link exchange requests too!
2] Journalist pitching is HARO-like and we have more sources than any others. AND if you are writing a blog post and want to source expert contributions to add to it, you can submit your site’s request too.
This seems like a good software, I’m interested in how it compares against press ranger. I already have t4 from them and it meets most of my needs. How might your plans compare to press rangers specifically? The more granularity the better
If you already have ranger and use it for pitch requests, then you likely don’t need this. If you want it for the link exchange network, then worth looking into.
We’re deep in the journalist requests.
This webinar video we did today will likely answer a bunch of questions:
https://www.facebook.com/loudegg/videos/1870979976909077
just PR from a database? how sure that its always updated? is there a real scraping or coming from a live dataset?
It’s primary function is not a database. It aggregates journalist requests for expert contributions from across the web.
FEATURES:
1] Journalist Pitch Aggregator
All media queries from multiple sources placed in one feed, matched to your expertise.
2] JournoRequests from X
Manually curated requests from X & beyond, filtered for relevance and delivered as notifications.
3] Link Exchange
Discover, manage, and execute backlink exchange opportunities to simplify off-page SEO workflows.
4] Media Database
Direct access to journalists and publishers for proactive outreach whenever you need it.
Only #4 is a database and yes it is growing and updated frequently via scraping and other ways. Though, this media database is not in the LTD.
Can you please consider adding Pitch Analyzer, Additional Pitch Tutorials, and AI Features (BYOK) to your Pro plan? Those features are really essential, especially byok, and pricing those features out at 699 is a bit harsh for folks not running big PR agencies or many companies.
Already evaluating if we can do this for the Pro plan. Difficult to include BYOK at that cost because of variety of reasons but will confirm the others in the next few days.
Why gatekeep ai features in T2? If you didn’t do this i (and likely many others) would buy it. I imagine you miss out on a lot of sales due to all the gatekeeping you do. I personally have passed several deals you offer because you gatekeep so many features on every tool, many of which don’t impact softwares bottom line..you seem to do it to push people to buy highest tier. Well, sir, it doesnt work, at least not for me and many others I know. Press Ranger is a good example of how to run a business model. Please don’t take it personally (I’ve seen how personally you take feedback in fb groups). It’s just some honest feedback.
Hi Spencer. no gatekeeping — it’s for sustainability. Buyers wrongly assume BYOK means all costs are borne by them – that’s not true. I provide a detailed explanation about this in a recent webinar we did with Joe here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgD6HKXLXcs
(please review it to understand the additional costs incurred even if it’s BYOK).
TLDR = This is a high-volume processing type app and each user’s profile/preferences/inputs are all processed per opportunity (hundreds per day) X multiply that by thousands of users, store that data, etc. Hope it makes sense.
In fact, we actually modified Tier 2 to include few things that were NOT included in the plan before. People bought this same product 3 years ago when it had half the features at the SAME PRICE as today. It sold out the first time.
Sales isn’t what we chase. Sustainability is far more important. The sales come through good products and long-term service.
If Ranger does what you need, then that is enough. If it doesn’t, then get this.
Appreciate the feedback but this is the best deal there ever has been and it’s already been improved to give more in T2. Any more is not possible.